Legal Opinion

Southern Bank of Commerce v. Union Planters National Bank

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 4, 2008No. 08-288PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

The instant appeal presents the question of whether Appellee Union Planters National Bank is a holder in due course, as defined by the Uniform Commercial Code, and is entitled to seek payment from Appellant Southern Bank of Commerce after a cashier’s check issued by Southern Bank was declined due to insufficient funds. On appeal, Southern Bank argues that the trial court erred in finding that Union Planters was a holder in due course. Southern Bank also argues that the trial court’s award to Union Planters of prejudgment interest was in error. Union Planters…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Wooten v. McClendonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Ozarks Unlimited Resources Cooperative, Inc. v. DanielsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Nelson v. River Valley Bank & TrustSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Reynolds Health Care Services, Inc. v. HMNH, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dunn v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Swindle v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  3. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria v. Easy Luck Co. Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. Crystal Clear Computer Solutions LLC v. Helena-West Helena Arkansas, City ofDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2021
  5. Swindle v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API