Legal Opinion

L.K.I. Holdings, Inc. v. Tyner

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1995No. 49A02-9410-CV-622PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRIEDLANDER, Judge.

L.K.I. Holdings, Inc. challenges the trial court's denial of its motion for summary judgment. LKI. also contends the trial court erred when it granted a motion for summary judgment in favor of its co-defendant, the City of Indianapolis.

We affirm.

The facts most favorable to the nonmov-ants are that on February 28, 1992, Sarah Tunney was driving northbound on Broken-hurst Road in Indianapolis. The portion of Brokenhurst Road upon which Tunney was traveling is intersected by Fall Creek Road on the north and Fall Creek Parkway on the south and is approximately 300 feet…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Burrell v. MeadsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Peavler v. BD. OF COM'RS MONROE CTY.Indiana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Havert v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Greathouse v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Kahf v. Charleston South ApartmentsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Torres v. El Paso Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Control Techniques, Inc. v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Waste Management, Inc. v. South Central Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  4. Duncan v. DuncanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Hagerman Construction, Inc. v. CopelandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API