Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank of Houston v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 5, 1958No. 6766Published

1Opinion

On- Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.

In our original opinion we held that the clause “but this defense shall apply only to such excess” as used in Subdivision 3 of Article 7329 should be interpreted to mean that one against whom the tax is sought to be collected could defend only as to the excess over and above the amount properly assessable on an equality basis, and unless the amount properly assessable on an equality basis was proven the judgment would stand.

In its motion for rehearing appellant insists we were in error in that part of our opinion just mentioned because in holding that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WhittenburgTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Whelan v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Rowland v. City of TylerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. State v. RichardsonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Bashara v. Saratoga Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API