Legal Opinion

Rowland v. City of Tyler

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1928No. 915—4995PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.

The sole question presented for determination in this ease is whether the action of the board of equalization of the city of Tyler in placing, a valuation upon the property of plaintiff in error was unlawful. The insistence is made that the evidence conclusively establishes that such valuation was ascertained pursuant to a definitely prescribed plan of procedure, wherein the estimated rental returns of said property were arbitrarily made the controlling and decisive factor in determining such valuation.

The trial court’s findings of fact upon this issue are as follows:

“I find that the said…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Lively v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Druesdow v. BakerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Johnson v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Town of Pleasanton v. VanceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. City of Amarillo v. HancockTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State v. WhittenburgTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  3. City of Arlington v. CannonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Whelan v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Electra Independent School Dist. v. W. T. Waggoner EstateTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API