Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bailey

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 31, 1936No. A-9225PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.

In the application for writ of habeas corpus, for discharge from imprisonment in the state penitentiary, R. F. Bailey alleges that he is unlawfully imprisoned and detained by the warden of the state penitentiary without authority of law under a judgment of conviction of the. superior court of Creek county, Bristow division, for the offense of being an habitual criminal, wherein he was sentenced to serve a term of five years in the state penitentiary. That on February 2, 1936, by commitment issued out of said superior court he was on said day delivered to the warden of the state penitentiary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Graham v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Koontz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Ex Parte GrantCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Barr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Harrison v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  2. The People v. LawrenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. The People v. AtkinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Sanders v. Waters, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  5. Solomon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1944

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API