Legal Opinion

Cotton Co. v. . Henrietta Mills

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 9, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action (1) for trespass, and (2) for negligent construction and operation of river dam.

It is alleged that thirty acres of plaintiff's land situate on Puzzle Creek have been sobbed and soured and the shrubbery thereon destroyed by the construction and negligent operation of the defendant's milldam on Second Broad River, which is several miles below plaintiff's property.

On the hearing, the plaintiff abandoned its allegations of negligence, and elected to stand solely upon its action for trespass.

On the issue of liability, the court instructed the jury as follows:

"The court instructs you…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chaffin v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Cline v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Little v. . StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matthews v. ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. England v. Ally Ong HingArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Rudd v. Electrolux Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997
  4. Forest City Cotton Co. v. Henrietta MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API