Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 1956No. Appeals, 142 to 158PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

This action of mandamus was brought against the city and its officials by plaintiffs, who are members of the city’s police department. They seek restoration of a 40 hour week, as against the 48 hour week they now work, as well as back wages. The court below denied their motion for judgment on the pleadings, hence this appeal.

Plaintiffs’ action rests on two ordinances effective October 29, 1951, and January 2, 1952, which established a 40 hour work week for city employes. Prior to the first of these ordinances, on April 17, 1951, the electors had approved the Home…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kittaning Coal Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Leary v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Thiel v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. O'DONNELL v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Breckline v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. TATE v. ANTOSHCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. United Steelworkers v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Baxter v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Commonwealth v. Harambee, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API