TATE v. ANTOSH
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Bowman,
Although not so posed by the parties to these consolidated appeals, the fundamental issue is whether the judiciary — to enforce an admitted obligation of the City of Philadelphia to certain of its employees — may direct the legislative branch of the government of that city to appropriate funds to meet such obligations.
Prior decisional law makes solution of the issue difficult. Compounding the difficulty is the impact, if any, of recent legislation on the subject of labor rela tions between public employees and their government employer.
The essential facts are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Washington Arbitration CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- COM. Ex Rel. CARROLL v. TATESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth ex rel. Carroll v. TateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Harney v. RUSSOSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Bladen v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Allegheny County Firefighters v. Allegheny CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Lycoming County v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- ROSS v. KEITTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Cheltenham Township v. Cheltenham Township Police DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Ashbourne School v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.