Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Co. v. Youngman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 1934No. Appeal, 169PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

The parties to this appeal are the executor of a judgment creditor of the defendant, Mrs. Youngman, and a garnishee, which, at the time of the trial, had money payable to the defendant under a will. The learned court below directed a verdict for the garnishee on the ground that plaintiff had not rebutted the presumption of payment, or shown that it was not applicable to the judgment. Appellant, on the other hand, contends that it was entitled to binding instructions, or, in any event, that the evidence should have been submitted to the jury.

The judgment was entered…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Foulk v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  2. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
  3. Frazier v. BergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Patterson v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. Gilmore v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Overbrook Heights Building & Loan Ass'n v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Sniderman v. NeroneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Schmalz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. In Re BoylanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Brady v. TarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API