Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 13, 1937No. 5 Div. 248PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The appeal and assignments o'f error challenge the overruling of demurrers to the bill as amended. The appeal was taken under section 6079, Code.

This is an original bill in the nature of a bill of review grounded upon fraud in the procurement of the decree, which it seeks to annul. Hogan v. Scott, 186 Ala. 310, 65 So. 209. While it is not subject to the requirement that permission of the court must be obtained for the filing, this consent was obtained and indorsed on the bill by the trial judge, without requiring or fixing bond under the provisions of section 6607 of the Code.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bolden v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Keenum v. DodsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Peters Mineral Land Co. v. HooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Brasher v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Cunningham v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Barbour v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Hooke v. HookeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Adkison v. AdkisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  5. Stephens v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API