Legal Opinion

Wilk v. Haus

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1983No. 10PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

The instant appeal by the Plaintiff-Appellant arises following the lower court’s granting of a motion for summary judgment which was filed by the Defendant-Appellees Robert S.S. Haus, Sr., his wife Mary R. Haus, and A.H. Casey.1 The Appellant contends that the lower court erred in granting summary judgment, because the record allegedly established the existence of material facts which precluded the entry of such a judgment. Moreover, the Appellant maintains the record was devoid of facts entitling the Appellees to summary judgment as a matter of law.

Our review in this case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Gonzalez v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Gonzalez v. United States Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Wagner v. GrannisDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Salerno v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Mentzer v. OgnibeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Fleet Real Estate Funding Corp. v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API