Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Didiano v. Beshara

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1995No. 93-2406Published

1DissentWright, J.

Hardened by some of the results obtained of late in this class of cases, I am merely puzzled by the outcome in this matter. However, I would suspect that the Industrial Commission’s posture will be a bit stronger than a sense of bewilderment.

In State ex rel. Didiano v. Beshara (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 256, 602 N.E.2d 1157 (“Didiano I”), this court unanimously granted a writ of mandamus indicating that a peremptory discontinuation of this claimant’s permanent total disability benefits without a finding that “claimant was not permanently and totally disabled” was an abuse of discretion.

In Didiano…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Zamora v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State ex rel. Brewer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Didiano v. BesharaOhio Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API