Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Odette

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1988No. Docket 97256PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s order granting defendant Odette’s motion for summary disposition in this legal malpractice case, as well as from the trial court’s order denying plaintiff’s motion for rehearing. In particular, plaintiff claims that she should have been allowed to amend her complaint to allege that defendant Odette committed legal malpractice when he failed to timely file a suit on plaintiff’s behalf against James W. McKay, on the basis that McKay knowingly furnished alcoholic beverages to then nineteen-year-old Kirk Gildner, who subsequent to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ben P. Fyke & Sons v. Gunter Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Longstreth v. GenselMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Steketee v. Lintz, Williams & RothbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. NeumannMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. People v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. New Hampshire InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Durant v. Department of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Teodorescu v. Bushnell, Gage, Reizen & ByingtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Mitchell v. DoughertyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Doyle v. Hutzel HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API