Legal Opinion

Lone Star Security & Video, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 7, 2016No. 14-55014, 14-55050PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURGUIA, Circuit Judge:

These consolidated appeals concern the constitutionality of five city ordinances that regulate mobile billboards. One of the ordinances limits the type of sign that may be affixed to motor vehicles parked or left standing on public streets; the other ordinances prohibit non-motorized, “mobile billboard advertising displays” within city limits. Appellants, who have been subject to enforcement under the ordinances, brought suit against the municipalities arguing that the mobile billboard laws im-permissibly restrict their freedom of speech in violation of the First…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Recycle for Change v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Vugo, Inc. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  3. Airbnb, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  4. Expressview Development, Inc. v. Town of Gates Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Thomas v. SchroerDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2017

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API