Legal Opinion

Pontiac & Lapeer Plank-road Co. v. Hilton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Oakland. (Stickney, J.) Debt for a statutory penalty. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDhamplin, J.

The plaintiff brought this action before a *116justice of the peace against the defendant to recover the penalty prescribed by section 17 of the plank-road act of 1848 for forcibly and illegally passing the gate of the plaintiff.

The defendant, having been defeated before the justice, appealed to the circuit court for the county of Oakland, and a judgment was again recovered by the plaintiff for the sum of $15.

The plaintiff’s declaration set forth that plaintiff was organized under the act of 1848, and the act complained of was forcibly and illegally passing the gate of the company situated on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grand Rapids Bridge Co. v. PrangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. City of Detroit v. Detroit & Erin Plank Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1864
  3. People ex rel. the Attorney General v. Grand Blanc & Holly Plank Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Neal v. GilmoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Canal Street Gravel-Road Co. v. PaasMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People v. SeveranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API