Legal Opinion

Grand Rapids Bridge Co. v. Prange

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1877PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Case made from Kent Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

*Coouey, Ch. J.:

The present suit is one for the recovery of tolls for crossing the plaintiff’s bridge over the Grand river at Grand Rapids. The plaintiff is a corporation organized in 1851 for the period of thirty years. The purpose of the organization was to build the bridge in question; hut as the river at this point was a navigable stream, the assent of the supervisors of the county was essential before the bridge could he constructed.— Gomp. L. 1871, § 26Jfi. The same board was also by law the competent *380authority to fix the tolls. The assent was given by resolution of the board dated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. President & Directors of the Manhattan Co.New York Supreme Court · 1832
  2. Swartwout v. Michigan Air Line RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Smith v. SheeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Wilson v. TessonIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Morgan v. Lawrenceburgh InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cedar Rapids Water Co. v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Detroit City Railway v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Bradley v. ReppellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  4. State ex rel. Fullerton v. Des Moines City RailwaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. State ex rel. County Attorney v. Des Moines City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API