Legal Opinion

Canal Street Gravel-Road Co. v. Paas

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1893PublishedCited by 6 opinions

■ Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLons, J.

This action was commenced in justice’s court to recover a penalty under the provisions of section 3642, How. Stat'. .Plaintiff - had judgment, and defendant appealed to the circuit court for Kent county, where the cause was tried before a jury, and verdict and judgment given in favor of the plaintiff.

The declaration in justice’s court was oral, on the common counts in assumpsit, and specially for the penalty mentioned in the statute above cited. Upon the trial in the circuit, defendant objected to any evidence under the declaration. Plaintiff, on motion, wafe permitted to amend its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Doyle v. MiznerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. People ex rel. Stewart v. Young Men's Father Matthew Total Abstinence Benevolent Society No. 1Michigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. People ex rel. Jones v. PritchardMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Board of Supervisors v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Messenger v. TeaganMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Soukup v. Van DykeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Loomis v. MackMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bridge Street & Allendale Gravel-Road Co. v. HogadoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. People v. McGlaughlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API