Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dunbar v. Ham

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1976No. 75-310PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

0 ’Neill, C. J.

The issue to be determined in this appeal is whether, under the provisions of Civ. R. 3(C) (4), a trial court, upon its own motion and without conducting a hearing, may order a change of venue to another county.

Civ. R. 3(C) (4) reads:

“Upon motion of any party or upon its own motion the court may transfer any action to an adjoining county within this state when it appears that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had in the county in which the suit is pending.”

Prior to the adoption of the Rules of Civil Proceedure,, R. C. 2311.38 provided for change of venue. That section, read:

“…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morrison v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Swindell-Dressler Corporation v. Honorable Edward Dumbaule, Judge of the United States District Court, Western District of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  3. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. Co. v. MatzingerOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Sudia v. Hill Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. Drayton v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State Ex Rel. Allied Chemical Co. v. AureliusOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Burton v. DutielOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Ellison v. K 2 Motors, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API