Legal Opinion
Sudia v. Hill Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1966No. 39468PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchueideb, J.
The principal issues presented are whether a trial court may, on its own motion, direct a jury to return a special verdict and whether it is error for a trial judge to direct a special verdict without giving notice of his intention so to do in order that counsel may prepare and deliver arguments accordingly.
Section 2315.12, Bevised Code, reads:
“The verdict of a jury must be either general or special.
“Unless otherwise directed by the court, a jury shall render a general verdict.”
Section 2315,15, Bevised Code, provides:
*162“If requested by either party before the giving of any special charge and…
2Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Dunbar v. HamOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Dessauer v. Memorial General HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Dessauer v. Memorial General HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981