Legal Opinion

Sudia v. Hill Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1966No. 39468PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchueideb, J.

The principal issues presented are whether a trial court may, on its own motion, direct a jury to return a special verdict and whether it is error for a trial judge to direct a special verdict without giving notice of his intention so to do in order that counsel may prepare and deliver arguments accordingly.

Section 2315.12, Bevised Code, reads:

“The verdict of a jury must be either general or special.
“Unless otherwise directed by the court, a jury shall render a general verdict.”

Section 2315,15, Bevised Code, provides:

*162“If requested by either party before the giving of any special charge and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Dunbar v. HamOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Dessauer v. Memorial General HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Dessauer v. Memorial General HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API