Legal Opinion

Cheney v. Wagner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion to strike transcript and petition in error from files.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This is a motion to strike the petition in error and transcript from the files: first, because no motion for a new trial was filed in the court below; second, no exceptions taken to the final judgment, and, third, because the transcript was not filed “within the time allowed by law for taking and docketing appeals.”

The failure to file a motion for a new trial, while it will prevenían examination of the proceedings occurring on the trial, is-no ground for dismissing a case filed in this court, as the errors complained of may be apparent from the pleadings and judgment. Neither is the second…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Slobodisky v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Territory of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Taylor v. CaffreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  3. Claflin v. American National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Erck v. Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Gaughran v. CrosbyNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API