Gaughran v. Crosby
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Dakota county. Tried below before Norris, J. cited, as to the proceedings in error: Sch. Dist. v. Cooper, 29 Neb., 433; Phenix Ins. Co. v. Peadinger, 28 Id., 587-; Dunham v. Courtnay, 24 Id., 627; Harrington v. Latta, 23 Id., 84; Carlow v. Aiiltman, 28 Id., 672; Cheney v. Wagner, 30 Id., 262.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
On the 15th day of March, 1888, one Hugh Gaughran, then a resident of Dakota county, died leaving his brothers and sisters, John Gaughran, Bridget Morf, Peter Gaughran, Mary Crosby, Catherine Leith, and Mat. Gaughran, his sole heirs at law. In January, 1888, Hugh Gaughran conveyed his real and personal property to the defendant, Mary Crosby, his sister.
The plaintiffs in error brought this action to set aside the deed to the real estate and the bill of sale of the personalty executed by said Hugh Gaughran in favor of said Mary Crosby, on ■ the ground that the same were procured by fraud and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carlow v. C. Aultman & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Cropsey v. WiggenhornNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
- Cheney v. WagnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by7 opinions
- Weber v. KirkendallNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Slobodisky v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Erck v. Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Smith v. SilverNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Wollam v. BrandtNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.