Legal Opinion
Islar v. Whole Foods Markets Group, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 17, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2016-1098PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Randolph D. Moss, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Gregory Islar was terminated from his position at a supermarket operated by Defendant Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. (‘Whole Foods”), Islar now brings claims against Whole Foods for (1) violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981; (2) breach of implied contract; and (3) negligent retention and supervision. See Dkt. 1-1 at 8-15. Whole Foods has moved to dismiss the third count for failure to state a claim under the rule of Griffin v. Acacia Life Insurance Co., 925 A.2d 564, 576-77 (D.C. 2007).…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Robinson v. Howard Univ., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Prasad v. George Wash. Univ.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Thorp v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Roe v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Abdelhady v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.