Legal Opinion

City of Norwood v. Burton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 2005No. Nos. C-050065 and C-050070Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mark P. Painter, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff/appellee and cross-appellant, the city of Norwood, appropriated the property of defendants/appellants and cross-appellees, Matthew F. Burton and Sanae Ichikawa Burton. A compensation trial was held to determine the amount to be awarded to the Burtons for the taking.

{¶ 2} The original appeal in this case challenged the taking of the property. The trial court’s judgment in the original appeal is affirmed on the authority of Norwood v. Horney, 161 Ohio App.3d 316, 2005-Ohio-2448, 830 N.E.2d 381, appeal accepted for review, 106 Ohio St.3d 1524,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sowers v. SchaefferOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Scott v. YatesOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. City of Cincinnati v. BanksOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API