Scott v. Yates
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.
In this case, we are asked to draw a clear distinction between accident investigation, which involves the collection and recording of information, and accident reconstruction, which involves use of scientific methodology to draw inferences from the investigative data. We decline the invitation to offer hard and fast rules pertaining to this issue. Instead, we confine our discussion to the particular facts at hand. In so doing, we simply find that the police officer testifying here went beyond his scope of expertise. Thus, we determine the trial court abused its…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Alexander v. Mt. Carmel Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State Auto Mutual Ins. v. Chrysler Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. HartmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. Thompson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. PrimeauOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. HartmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Jenkins v. City of GallipolisOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.