Quirk v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtMeVICAR, District Judge
(after stating tho facts as above).
The United States is not in the insurance business for profit, but only for the purpose of protection to those who offered themselves voluntarily or involuntarily as sacrifices in its military and naval service. Such contracts should be construed liberally so as to afford the protection intended by the statutes. White v. U. S., 270 U. S. 175, 180, 46 S. Ct. 274, 70 L. Ed. 530; Peart v. Chaze, 13 F.(2d) 908 (D. C. W. D. La.); and Starnes v. U. S., 13 F.(2d) 212 (D. C. E. D. Tex.). Congress evidently intended that such contracts should be so construed, as…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. GoldenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
- United States v. EliassonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.