Chamblee v. Weeks
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SHORES, Justice.
Houston Weeks filed suit against the Chamblees, asking the court to fix the boundary line between their adjoining properties. After an ore tenus nonjury trial, the court held that Weeks had adversely possessed the disputed strip of land for the requisite period. The defendants appealed. We affirm.
When a trial judge hears ore tenus evidence in a boundary line dispute, the court’s judgment determining the boundary line is presumed correct and will be upheld if supported by credible evidence. Bell v. Jackson, 530 So.2d 42 (Ala.1988); Nelson v. Styron, 524 So.2d 353 (Ala.1988);…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bell v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Helms v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Nelson v. StyronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Anderson v. WootenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Hagood v. HensleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
3Cited by2 opinions
- Valentine v. IrelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Waldrop v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990