Legal Opinion

Waldrop v. Knight

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 6, 1990No. 89-385PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHORES, Justice.

This is a dispute over a boundary line and the use of well water. James Harold Knight, the plaintiff/appellee, and Cecil and Margaret Waldrop, the defendants/appellants, are coterminous landowners in Winston County, Alabama. The tracts owned by the parties were once a single parcel; it was divided into two separate parcels. Knight is in possession of the northern half and the Waldrops are in possession of the southern half.

Knight sued the Waldrops, asking the court to fix the boundary line between the adjoining properties and to enjoin the Wal-drops from interfering with his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bell v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Helms v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Nelson v. StyronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Chamblee v. WeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Valentine v. IrelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API