Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Wooten

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1989No. 87-968, 87-1013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Delano D. and Joann B. Anderson appeal from a judgment granting William J. Wooten specific performance of a real estate sales contract, and incidental damages. Wooten cross-appeals, arguing that the damages awarded were inadequate.

In February 1986, the Andersons listed their approximately 180-acre farm with United Farm Agency, Inc., a real estate agency. In the fall of 1986, Danny Fulford, the broker with United Farm Agency who was handling the Anderson farm listing, began discussing with Wooten the purchase of the farm.

On November 12, 1986, after several proposals and counter proposals were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Indus. MacHinery, Inc. v. Creative DisplaysSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Pugh v. CallowaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Wray v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Suter v. Arrowhead Inv. Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. Grayson v. BoyetteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chamblee v. WeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. El Paso Production Co. v. Geomet, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  3. Aldridge v. OliveSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API