Castillo v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AFFIRMING DENIAL OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF
¶ 1 Petitioner, pro se, filed an Application for Post-Conviction Relief in the District Court of Carter County, Case No. CF 96-180. A judge of the district court entered Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on June 10, 1997 and denied relief. From that Order, Petitioner appeals.
¶ 2 Petitioner was convicted of Trafficking in Cocaine in Case No. CF 96-180. He was sentenced to ten (10) years imprisonment and did not appeal. In the district court, Petitioner claimed entitlement to post-conviction relief, asserting he was denied equal protection…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex Parte McClureCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Swart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Hopkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Conn v. PageCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
3Cited by7 opinions
- Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- STATE v. HURTCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- Charles Nestell v. Ken Klinger Attorney General of the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Christopher Mulhausen v. Ken KlingerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- STATE v. HURTCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.