Legal Opinion
STATE v. HURT
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 4, 2014No. S-2013-476PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*8SUMMARY OPINION
LUMPKIN, Judge.
{1 Appellee, Lamont Eugene Hurt, was charged by Information February, 18, 2018, in the District Court of Tulsa County, Case No. CF-2013-720, with Failure To Register As Sex Offender (57 0.8.2011, § 587). The State alleged that Appellee was subject to the terms and conditions of the Sex Offenders Registration Act but had failed to register on or about July 20, 2012. Appellee waived preliminary hearing but filed his Motion to Dismiss and argued that the Sex Offenders Registration Act (57 0.8.2011, §§ 581-590.2) could not be retroactively applied to him. At a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Good v. KeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- NEWLUN v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- NEWLUN v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- STATE v. HURTCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- STATE v. HURTCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- Thomas Bon Stout v. County of Maricopa, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018