Legal Opinion

Fashion Place Associates v. Glad Rags, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1988No. 20514PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Associate Chief Justice:

Respondent Fashion Place Associates sued to recover damages for breach of a lease by its tenant, appellant Glad Rags, Inc. The trial court found that Glad Rags had breached the lease by abandoning the premises and awarded Fashion Place damages, costs, and attorney fees in the amount of $17,077.59. Glad Rags appeals, claiming that the trial court erred because Fashion Place sustained no monetary damage on account of the breach.

The lease provides in relevant part:

Article 22

DEFAULTS BY TENANT... [S]hould the Tenant vacate or abandon the premises; then the Landlord…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Turtle Management, Inc. v. Haggis Management, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Snyderville Transportation Co. v. ChristiansenUtah Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reid v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Foote v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Henderson v. For-Shor Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  4. Linebaugh v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  5. Aris Vision Institute, Inc. v. Wasatch Property Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API