Legal Opinion
United States v. 874 Gartel Drive
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 22, 1996No. 94-56237PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
Isidro and Josefina Beltran appeal an order forfeiting their property under 18 U.S.C. § 981. The government brought the forfeiture action alleging that the Beltrans’ property was involved in, or was traceable to, a transaction that violated 31 U.S.C. §§ 5313(a) and 5324(a). See 18 U.S.C. 981(a)(1)(A). It is illegal under 31 U.S.C. § 5324(a)(3) to structure, or assist in structuring, any transaction for the purpose of evading the reporting requirements of 31 U.S.C. § 5313(a). Section 5313(a), when augmented by the Treasury Secretary’s regulation, requires financial institutions to report…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gasho v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 450 SEL, VIN 11603302064538Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Brig Malek AdhelSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. CarrellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1945, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3305 United States of America v. Real Property 874 Gartel Drive, Walnut, California, Including Any Buildings, Appurtenances or Improvements Located Thereon, and Isidro Beltran Josefina Beltran, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. 5443 Suffield Terrace, Skokie, IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- In Re One 1986 Pontiac FirebirdSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- United States v. 3814 Nw Thurman StreetDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.