Legal Opinion
United States v. 3814 Nw Thurman Street
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 1, 1996No. Civil 95-940-FRPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRYE, District Judge;
The matters before the court are 1) claimant’s motion for summary judgment (# 62); and 2) plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (# 70).
BACKGROUND
This is a civil in rem forfeiture action in which the United States seeks to forfeit real property with buildings, appurtenances and improvements commonly known as 3814 N.W. Thurman Street, Portland, Oregon pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C). The complaint was filed on June 29, 1995. An amended complaint was filed on July 17, 1995. The warrant for arrest of property was issued on July 25, 1995.
On August 7, 1995, Gloria…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. 874 Gartel DriveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 135, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 167 United States of America v. 3814 Nw Thurman Street, Portland, Oregon, a Tract of Real Property, Gloria Ladum, Claimant-Appellant, Chemical Bank Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. 3814 NW Thurman Street, PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999