Cohen v. Wallace
California Supreme Court
Application to the Supreme Court for a peremptory writ of mandate to compel the settlement of a bill of exceptions and hearing in said court upon an alternative writ issued to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, William T. Wallace, judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
Application for a writ of mandate to compel the settlement of a bill of exceptions.
The petition sets forth that petitioner, Louis Cohen, was tried and convicted in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, before respondent, the Hon. William T. Wallace, a judge of said court, of the crime of perjury; that judgment was entered on the verdict on January 18, 1895, and that thereafter, on January 28th, and within the time allowed by law, petitioner, upon notice to the district attorney, delivered to the clerk of the court for said judge a proposed bill of exceptions in said case…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. JanuaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. GettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Sansome v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. SpragueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alferitz v. IngallsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
- Hertter v. AddisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Kouts v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Winters v. BuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Cripe v. UnangstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.