Legal Opinion
Hensley v. United Transports, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided August 21, 1972No. CA-5-932PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WOODWARD, District Judge.
The above ease was called for trial on the 10th day of August, 1972, in Lubbock, Texas, and there appeared in open court each of the parties and their attorneys and all parties announced ready for trial, with the exception of the defendant Union, Local No. 577, which reserved the right to request continuance of the trial for the purpose of presenting this defendant’s case at a later date. The case was tried before the Court without a jury.
After hearing and examining the evidence presented to the Court and the argument of counsel, the Court files…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ostrofsky v. United Steelworkers of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959
- Woodrow Haynes v. United States Pipe & Foundry Company (Anniston Soil Pipe Division, Formerly Known as T.C. King Pipe and Foundry Company)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- James Lomax v. Armstrong Cork Company, Walter S. Radcliffe, Jr., and John N. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Norman E. Edwards and Bobby Wayne Mize v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Connally v. Transcon LinesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Norman E. Edwards and Bobby Wayne Mize v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Connally v. LinesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Hardin v. Strickland Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1975