Legal Opinion

State v. Head

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1986No. 8522SC761PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

I

In his first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss for insufficient evidence. The evidentiary principles governing motions to dismiss are set out at length in State v. Earnhardt, 307 N.C. 62, 296 S.E. 2d 649 (1982). Briefly summarized, they are that the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the State, with the benefit of all permissible favorable inferences. If the trial judge finds substantial evidence, regardless of weight, of each essential element of the crime, and that defendant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. EdwardsNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Ventura v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API