Legal Opinion
Russell, Poling & Co. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 2, 1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
This is a motion by the third party defendant for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the third party complaint. A proper consideration of the motion requires analysis of the pleadings.
The action was commenced on the civil side of the Court by plaintiffs against the United States of America under the Federal Tort Claims Act1 to recover damages to a steel barge owned by plaintiffs, the Russell No. 29.
The complaint alleges that while the Russell No. 29 was in tow of the tug Corporal owned and operated by Conners-Standard Marine Corporation (hereinafter called Conners)…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Afran Transport Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Behar v. SavardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Burgess v. M/V TamanoDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1974
- Pioneer Steamship Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1959
- U. S. Coast Guard Vessel CG-95321District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.