Legal Opinion

State v. Vargas

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 24, 1994No. 11628PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a plea of nolo contendere made pursuant to General Statutes § 54-94a1 of a charge of possession of narcotics with the intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in viola*494tion of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b). The defendant filed a motion to suppress evidence. After an evidentiary hearing,2 the trial court denied the defendant’s motion to suppress. Thereafter, the defendant elected to enter a plea of nolo contendere, conditioned on his right to appeal the denial of his motion. The defendant was sentenced to a term…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. United States v. James Thomas CherryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. BoydConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  3. State v. StoryConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. State v. MartinezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. State v. BurkeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API