Pettis v. Harken, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This case is before us on writ of certiorari to review a decision of the Industrial Commission. The relators contend that the respondent is not entitled to workmen’s compensation benefits for the reason that at the time he was injured he was an independent contractor and not an employee.
From the record it appears that in February 1959 Harlan Hohen-stein, who had been engaged in business as an individual under the name of Minnesota Valley Fertilizer Company, incorporated with others under the name of Harken, Inc. Hohenstein became treasurer and secretary of the new company.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Hansen v. AdentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Rouse v. Town of Bird IslandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Lemkuhl v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Bolin v. ScheurerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Guhlke v. Roberts Truck LinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Myers v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
- In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
- St. Croix Sensory Inc. v. Department of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Toughill v. MelcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.