Legal Opinion

Estate of Day v. Hanover Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 20, 2011No. 2010-756PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynn, J.

The petitioners, the Estate of June M. Day (Estate), Byron S. Day and Stephanie L. Day, appeal the Superior Court’s (Tucker, J.) ruling that respondent Hanover Insurance Company’s (Hanover) consent to settle a claim by the petitioners with the insurer of a third party tortfeasor did not preclude Hanover from contesting its liability to provide the Estate underinsured motorist coverage under its insurance contract with the Estate’s decedent. We affirm.

The summary judgment record reveals the following pertinent facts. On September 18, 2007, June M. Day was fatally injured in a motor vehicle…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bean v. Red Oak Property Management, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  2. Atwood v. OwensSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  3. Matarese v. New Hampshire Municipal Ass'n Property-Liability Insurance Trust, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  4. Northern Security Insurance v. ConnorsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  5. Funai v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Strike Four, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  2. Oak Brook Condominium Owners' Association v. Gerard DufresneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API