Legal Opinion

Funai v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 28, 2000No. 99-190PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.

The plaintiffs, Richard and Cheryl Funai, appeal the Superior Court’s {Abramson, J.) grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Company (Metropolitan), ruling that the clear and unambiguous language of the parties’ insurance policy requires the consent of both parties before arbitration can occur. We affirm.

The following facts are undisputed. In March 1994, plaintiff Richard Funai was in an automobile accident and suffered damages. At the time of the accident, the plaintiffs were insured by Metropolitan. The plaintiffs brought a claim against the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  2. Deyette v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  3. Whitcomb v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  4. A.J. Cameron Sod Farms, Inc. v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  5. Amica Mutual Insurance v. MorrisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Littlefield v. Acadia InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Schleicher & Stebbins Hotels, L. L.C.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2019
  3. Contoocook Valley School District v. Graphic Arts Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  4. Furukawa v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  5. Estate of Day v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API