Legal Opinion

Linehan v. Linehan

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 4, 1983No. CA82-373PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Judge.

Appellee, Janet Linehan Tunstill, originated this action by filing a petition for citation of contempt. Her petition was founded upon an alleged independent contract between the parties, which provided among other things for appellant, Stephen Linehan, to pay appellee alimony of $5,000.00 at $100.00 per month for five years at no interest. Appellant alleged that the alimony provision was part of a stipulation that merged into the decree and was modifiable by the court. The chancellor ruled that the alimony provision was part of an independent contract and was not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wyandotte Chemicals Corp. v. Royal Electric Manufacturing Company, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Lawrence v. LawrenceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Seaton v. SeatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  4. Beasley v. BeasleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  5. Stout v. StoutCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rye v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Cummings v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Meadors v. MeadorsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Federal Land Bank of St. Louis v. Cupples Farms (In Re Cupples Farms)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1991
  5. McGaugh v. McGaughCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API