Legal Opinion

Meadors v. Meadors

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 18, 1997No. CA 96-1138PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judith Rogers, Judge.

This is an appeal from the dismissal of appellant’s motion for contempt based on a finding that her claim was barred by the statute of limitations. For reversal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in applying the five-year statute of limitations applicable to written contracts to a provision in a property settlement agreement that was incorporated into a decree of divorce. Failing that, she contends that the five-year statute of limitations had not expired. We affirm.

The marriage of appellant, Judith Meadors, and appellee, Thomas Meadors, ended in divorce by a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. McElroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  2. Burns v. BurnsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Seaton v. SeatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  4. Armstrong v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Linehan v. LinehanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dugal Logging, Inc. v. Arkansas Pulpwood Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Ebbing v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Tiner v. TinerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Keesha Curtis v. U.S. Bank Trust National Association, Not in Its Individual Capacity but Solely as Trustee of Lsrmf Mh Master Participation Trust II; Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration; And Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API