Lee Testing & Engineering, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Transportation
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Defendants’ Renewed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 16.) Despite being granted an extension of time in which to timely respond (ECF No. 21), Plaintiffs have not filed an opposition to the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED and this case is dismissed.
I. Background
Plaintiff Lee Testing & Engineering, Inc. (“LT & E”) filed the original Complaint in this action on September 8, 2011. (ECF No. 2.) LT & E is alleged to have been a corporation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ball ex rel. Burba v. KasichDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
- Bradley v. DewineDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Terry v. DewineDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Bradley v. Ohio Ethics CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
- Carnes v. Ohio Department of TaxationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.