40 Clinton Street Associates v. Dolgin
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Margaret Taylor, J.
In their motions for summary judgment, respondents (Tenants) allege that the above nonpayment proceedings must be dismissed on the ground that petitioner (Landlord) is barred from maintaining any action or proceeding for the collection of rents because no certificate of occupancy exists for the premises (the building) and none existed during the period for which rents are claimed. Tenants base their motions on subdivision 1 of section 301 and section 302 (subd 1, par b) of the Multiple Dwelling Law.
The apartments in the building are rented for dwelling…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Baum Residence Corp. v. Van RossonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1954
- Guarino v. TimaresAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1949
3Cited by2 opinions
- 111 on 11 Realty Corp. v. NortonCivil Court of the City of New York · 2001
- 58 East 130th Street LLC v. MoutonCivil Court of the City of New York · 2009