Legal Opinion

Guarino v. Timares

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 20, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

It is undisputed that there was no certificate of occupancy issued for the premises in question and that the violation existed during the period for which rent was claimed. This proceeding for nonpayment of rent is therefore barred by the provisions of paragraph b of subdivision 1 of section 302 of the Multiple Dwelling Law. (Conka v. MacAloon, N. Y. L. J., Jan. 12, 1948, p. 132, col. 4; Mellini v. Di Martino, N. Y. L. J., March 16, 1940, p. 1218, col. 6.)

The final order and judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs to the tenant, and landlord’s petition dismissed,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lipkis v. PikusCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
  2. Washington Square Professional Building, Inc. v. LeaderCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  3. 40 Clinton Street Associates v. DolginCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
  4. 111 on 11 Realty Corp. v. NortonCivil Court of the City of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API