Legal Opinion

Baum Residence Corp. v. Van Rosson

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 27, 1954PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial judge should have granted the motion to dismiss made at the close of all the evidence. The bar against recovery of rent set forth in section 302 of the Multiple Dwelling Law; for the period during which a dwelling is occupied, when no certificate of occupancy as required by section 301 thereof has prior thereto been obtained, comprehends within its prohibition any action to recover for the use and occupation of the premises, however denominated. Such circumvention of the statute cannot be countenanced.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lipkis v. PikusCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
  2. Commercial Hotel, Inc. v. WhiteAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2002
  3. Washington Square Professional Building, Inc. v. LeaderCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  4. Dreamy Hollow Apartments Corp. v. LewisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
  5. 40 Clinton Street Associates v. DolginCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API