Legal Opinion

Courturier v. Heidelberger Druckmaschinen, Ag

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1983No. Docket 61893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. C. Kingsley, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from a judgment of no cause of action on his products liability claim for personal injuries. The claim arose from injuries which the plaintiff suffered when his hand was caught in the rollers of a printing press manufactured by defendant Heidelberger Druckmaschinen and distributed by defendant Heidelberg Eastern.

Plaintiff’s complaint as originally filed alleged negligence and breach of implied warranty by the defendants. Prior to the commencement of trial, however, the negligence count was withdrawn by the plaintiff, and the matter proceeded with only the breach…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Certified QuestionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Karl v. Bryant Air Conditioning Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Barefield v. La Salle Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Bias v. AusburyMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Rabior v. KelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Auto-Owners Insurance GroupMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Interocean Ships, Inc. v. Samoa GasesHigh Court of American Samoa · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API