Cook v. Charles Hoertz & Son
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Floyd Cook presented his claim for compensation against Charles Hoertz & Son for injuries received in defendants’ employ: On petition of defendants for an order discontinuing weekly payments. From an order denying the petition, defendants bring certiorari.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
While plaintiff was in the employ of defendant contractors he was injured. His injuries were received October 19, 1914, and are described by his physician as:
“A compound, comminuted fracture of the femur of the right leg, about the junction of the upper and middle third; a fracture of the tibia of the right leg below the knee; a fracture of the tibia of the left leg below the knee; both ankles badly bruised; patient in extreme shock.”
*130.The fractures were reduced, the bones placed in position, and splints put on. The parties agreed upon the amount of compensation which plaintiff was entitled…
2Cited by16 opinions
- O'Brien v. Albert A. Albrecht Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Oleszek v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
- New York Indemnity Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Brinkert v. Kalamazoo Vegetable Parchment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Campbell v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.