Legal Opinion

Bickel v. American Can Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1950No. 32095PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.

The sole question before us is whether, under the allegations in plaintiff’s amended petition, a cause of action was stated. This question involves the application of Section 6307-21, General Code, which reads in part as follows:

“* * * and no person shall drive any motor vehicle, trackless trolley or streetcar in and upon any street or highway at a greater speed than will permit him to bring it to a stop within the assured clear distance ahead. ’ ’

The meaning and interpretation of the foregoing statute have been before this court many times, just as similar statutes have been before the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kormos v. Cleveland Retail Credit Men's Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Skinner v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Gumley, Admr. v. CowmanOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Higbee Co. v. LindemannOhio Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Spalding v. WaxlerOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Arrasmith v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  3. Difederico v. ReedOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Millhorn v. Donaldson Baking Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Schultz v. MeyerholtzOhio Court of Appeals · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API